Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-12-22T19:02:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > The backup history file is a slightly bit quirky way of doing things and > was designed when the transfer mechanism was file-based. > Why don't we just write a new xlog record that contains the information > we need? Certainly not. The history file is, in the restore-from-archive case, needed to *find* the xlog data. However, it's not clear to me why SR should have any need for it. It's not doing restore from archive. regards, tom lane