Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>,
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2019-11-25T14:52:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 02:35:50AM +0300, Nikita Glukhov wrote: >> Attached 8th version of the patches. > Please be careful here. The CF entry was still marked as waiting on > author, but you sent a new patch series which has not been reviewed. > I have moved this patc to next CF instead. That seems a bit premature --- the new patch is only a couple of days old. The CF entry should've been moved back to "Needs Review", sure. (Having said that, the end of the month isn't that far away, so it may well end up in the next CF anyway.) regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Avoid full scan of GIN indexes when possible
- 4b754d6c16e1 13.0 landed