Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-06-21T21:37:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Teach SP-GiST to do index-only scans.
- 922036249340 9.2.0 cited
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas < > heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I don't think we want to expose TrickFunctionCall2(). Not with that name, >> anyway. Perhaps we should refactor the functions called this way, >> range_adjacent, range_overlaps etc., to have internal counterparts that can >> be called without FunctionCall(). Like: > I like idea of replacing TrickFunctionCall2 with internal function. Do you > think I should post a separate patch for existing GiST code? +1 ... that was a pretty grotty hack, so let's get rid of it if we can. It's still going to require some documentation though I think. regards, tom lane