Re: Some surprising precedence behavior in PG's grammar

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Isn't there already some gadget which forces postfix operators to be
> discouraged compared to some other interpretation in other cases?

Yeah.  I'm not unhappy with the current grammar's behavior in this case.
What's bothering me is that the implementation seems likely to create
surprising/unexpected behaviors after future grammar changes.

			regards, tom lane