Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

Cc: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>

Date: 2010-06-28T19:10:13Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> While I would personally prefer to have an operator for the slicing
> opeeration, I'm not willing to spend time arguing about it.  So, +1 to
> implement the subset operation as the function slice(), and defer having
> an operator until later.

Yeah, I think the consensus is to avoid picking an operator name at all.
"slice()" is OK by me.

			regards, tom lane