Re: Header checking failures on LLVM-less machines

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't think we are actually contradicting each other. The aim of that
> error was to prevent pieces of code that aren't conditional on
> --with-llvm from including llvmjit.h.  I was, for a moment and wrongly,
> thinking that we could style the header in a way that'd make it both for
> safe for cpluspluscheck and still error in that case, but that was a
> brainfart.  But even leaving that brainfart aside, I'm not arguing
> against adding those include guards, so ...?

Works for me now.  Thanks for fixing.

			regards, tom lane