Re: move 0 behaviour

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-10-30T18:19:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I did some research on this.  It turns out the parser uses 0 for ALL, so
> when you do a FETCH ALL it is passing zero.  Now, when you do MOVE 0,
> you are really asking for FETCH ALL and all the tuples are thrown away
> because of the MOVE.

Yeah.  I think this is a bug and "MOVE 0" ought to be a no-op ... but
changing it requires a different parsetree representation for MOVE ALL,
which is tedious enough that it hasn't gotten done yet.

> I have the following patch which just documents the fact that MOVE 0
> goes to the end of the cursor.  It does not change any behavior, just
> document it.

It should be documented as behavior that is likely to change.  Also,
I believe FETCH 0 has the same issue.

			regards, tom lane