Re: Improving the notation for ecpg.addons rules

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> The patch does not apply on HEAD due to the dependency with the other
> things you are proposing, and I would have hardcoded failures to check
> that the reports are correct, but that looks neat on read.

I did test it by injecting errors, but I don't see why we'd leave
those in place?

Anyway, my thought was to merge this into the other patch series,
but I didn't do that yet.

			regards, tom lane