Re: Build fails for pl/tcl on OpenBSD
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Robert Hentosh <hentosh@io.com>, pgsql-bugs@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2001-05-06T00:48:51Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> better find the appropriate version of tclsh first. It would appear >> from looking at configure that the --with-tclconfig option is fairly >> useless, since if you don't set it the correct value is extracted by >> asking tclsh. You'd only need to specify it if your Tcl setup is not >> internally consistent. > The idea might have been that you could select which one of several > installed Tcl version to use. E.g., if you have a cutting edge > experimental build somewhere you could use > --with-tclconfig=$HOME/tcl-install/lib. Right, but AFAICT it's sufficient (and perhaps also necessary) to make sure that your cutting-edge Tcl is first in your PATH. If you do PATH=$HOME/tcl-install/bin:$PATH configure ... then the same result is achieved by asking tclsh where to search for tclConfig.sh. I am not sure whether tclsh is used for anything else during the build; if it isn't then setting PATH isn't essential. (In the perl case it *is* essential to set PATH...) > Anyway, the problem here seems to be that the tclConfig.sh file does not > provide a variable that gives a hint where to look for include files. 'Twould be nicer if it did that, all right. regards, tom lane