Thread

  1. Re: [HACKERS] Re: Arrays versus 'type constant' syntax

    Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at> — 1999-07-15T07:35:17Z

    > Hmm.  OK, then, we're stuck with a tradeoff that (fortunately) only
    > affects arrays.  Is it better to force subscripted column names to be
    > fully qualified "table.column[subscripts]" (the current situation),
    > or to allow bare column names to be subscripted at the cost of requiring
    > casts from string constants to array types to use the long-winded CAST
    > notation (or nonstandard :: notation)?
    > 
    Yes, me thinks so too.
    
    > I would guess that the cast issue comes up *far* less frequently than
    > subscripting, so we'd be better off changing the behavior.  But the
    > floor is open for discussion.
    > 
    Yes.
    
    	I have this change implemented and tested here, btw, but I won't
    check
    	it in until I see if there are objections...
    
    I would apply it :-)
    
    Andreas