Re: integer to float8 propagation (missing decimal)

Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas.zeugswetter@telecom.at>

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ <Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at>
To: "'pgsql-hackers@hub.org'" <pgsql-hackers@hub.org>
Date: 1998-02-09T08:59:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I think the real problem right now is the lack of a decimal type.
An integer out of range could be converted to a decimal without 
loosing precision. I think this would be the right thing to do.
This is how Informix and DB/2 do it (and Oracle I guess).
I personally think postgresql should not force the user to use 
typecasts where it is not absolutely necessary.

Andreas