Re: Makefile for parser
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-07-01T05:43:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> writes: > On the topic of make, have you all read "Recursive Make Considered > Harmful" at http://www.tip.net.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html I read it, I don't believe a word of it. The whole thing is founded on a bogus example, to which is added specious reasoning and an assumption that everyone wants to use GCC as compiler plus a nonstandardly-patched version of GNU make. This is not the real world. The Postgres build setup is certainly far from ideal, but IMHO the only thing *really* wrong with it is that we're not constructing accurate dependency lists by default. I believe Peter E. is planning to fix that... regards, tom lane