Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Rolf Grossmann <grossman@securitas.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-24T16:11:37Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE> writes: >> This is arguably a bug fix, so you needn't worry about it being beta >> phase. > I'm not sure how this works now: Do I just commit it to the tree, so it > will be in when, say, beta2 gets generated? Right. No real difference in commit procedures at this point. At some point after the release, we will set up a branch for REL_7.0, and after that, ordinary commits will only apply to new development for 7.1, not to the stable release branch. But no need to worry about that for now. > Ah, a tcsh user! ;) I could go for an -X option to suppress reading the > startup file, with default being that it is read in any mode. A pretty > dump option letter, but not all that far-fetched. Works for me... regards, tom lane