Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>,
cary huang <hcary328@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-10-16T03:02:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 2:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> Another theory would be one of these weird compiler optimization issue >> from xlc? In recent history, there was 8d2a01ae12cd. > Yeah, there are more like that too. xlc 12.1 is dead (like the OS > version it shipped with). New versions are available on cfarm if we > care about this target. But I am conscious of the cosmic law that if > you blame the compiler too soon you can cause the bug to move into > your code... I'm having a hard time not believing that this is a compiler bug. Looking back at 8d2a01ae12cd and its speculation that xlc is overly liberal about reordering code around sequence points ... I wonder if it'd help to do this calculation in a local variable, and only assign the final value to result->time ? But we have to reproduce the problem first. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Dodge a compiler bug affecting timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
- f4f55d5124a9 13.13 landed
- e98f47d570a2 11.22 landed
- d8c2877b9efa 12.17 landed
- 85c9dda81887 14.10 landed
- 5463319acd19 15.5 landed
- 1ad3a7bd396a 16.1 landed
- 19fa977311b9 17.0 landed
-
Back-patch test cases for timetz_zone/timetz_izone.
- fdf8b70a51cf 13.13 landed
- dc159b95d921 14.10 landed
- b18781c2df44 12.17 landed
- 4a427b82cf19 16.1 landed
- 29231dbd40cb 15.5 landed
- 05b4614decac 11.22 landed
-
Add regression test coverage for timetz_izone().
- 2f047203074c 17.0 landed
-
Add support for AT LOCAL
- 97957fdbaa42 17.0 landed
-
doc: Mention timezone(zone, time) in section for AT TIME ZONE
- 7e1f544827ec 17.0 landed
-
Use HASH_BLOBS for xidhash.
- a1b8aa1e4eec 14.0 cited