Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-05-21T18:21:37Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> So... can we get back to coming up with a reasonable
> definition,

(1) no access to system calls (including file and network I/O)

(2) no access to process memory, other than variables defined within the
PL.

What else?

			regards, tom lane