Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2022-03-06T12:46:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/4/22 15:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> On 3/4/22 20:29, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
>>> So, we probably have corrupted indexes that were updated since such 
>>> "incomplete" upgrade of ltree.
>> IIRC pg_upgrade is not expected to upgrade extensions - it keeps the
>> installed version of the extension, and that's intentional.
> Yeah, exactly.  But this opens up an additional consideration we
> have to account for: whatever we do needs to work with either 1.1
> or 1.2 SQL-level versions of the extension.
>
> 			


This is an area not currently touched by the buildfarm's cross version
upgrade testing, which basically compares a pre-upgrade and post-upgrade
dump of the databases. The upgraded cluster does contain
contrib_regression_ltree.

I'm open to suggestions on how we might improve the buildfarm's testing
of upgraded indexes generally.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops

  2. Implement operator class parameters