Re: documentation typo

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> It might be worth splitting that part into one section with the
> current function (lo_create) and then a separate section with the
> backwards-compatible lo_creat function though -- I can see how it's
> easy to come to the conclusion you did from reading it, and that could
> be made a lot more clear.

I dunno, the section already makes it perfectly clear that there
are two functions.  I could get behind documenting the more modern
one first, though.

I wonder if it's time to remove the references to PG 8.1?

			regards, tom lane