Re: Using each rel as both outer and inner for JOIN_ANTI

Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for reminding.  Attached is the rebased patch, with no other
> changes.  I think the patch is ready for commit.

Pushed after a little further fooling with the comments.  I also had
to rebase it over 11c2d6fdf (Parallel Hash Full Join).  I think I did
that correctly, but it's not clear to me whether any of the existing
test cases are now doing parallelized hashed right antijoins.  Might
be worth a little more testing.

I think that Alvaro's concern about incorrect cost estimates may be
misplaced.  I couldn't find any obvious errors in the costing logic for
this, given that we concluded that the early-exit runtime logic cannot
apply.  Also, when I try simply executing Richard's original test query
(in a non-JIT build), the runtimes I get line up quite well ... maybe
too well? ... with the cost estimates:

			v15		HEAD w/patch	Ratio

Cost estimate		173691.19	90875.33	0.52
Actual (best of 3)	514.200 ms	268.978 ms	0.52

I think the smaller differentials you guys were seeing were all about
EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead.

			regards, tom lane