Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-07T23:30:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Now, how to convert these? Not supplying the ops works fine, but > pg_dump supplies the ops. Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops, > we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few > releases. Comments? Ugly, but probably the best stopgap for backwards compatibility ... at least I can't think of a better answer, since we have no way to change what 6.5 pg_dump will dump. You're only going to suppress "network_ops" if it appears in the ops position of a CREATE INDEX, right? Don't want to stop people from using the name for fields and so on. regards, tom lane