Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-07T23:30:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Now, how to convert these?  Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> pg_dump supplies the ops.  Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> releases.  Comments?

Ugly, but probably the best stopgap for backwards compatibility ...
at least I can't think of a better answer, since we have no way to
change what 6.5 pg_dump will dump.

You're only going to suppress "network_ops" if it appears in the
ops position of a CREATE INDEX, right?  Don't want to stop people
from using the name for fields and so on.

			regards, tom lane