Re: index scan over composite type
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2018-05-15T20:57:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fix-merge-join-with-record_eq.patch (text/x-diff) patch
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: > I'm not understand why postgres prefers to sort table instead of using > index only scan when query is a simple inner join on composite type. > Query with equality clause with constant works fine with index scan but > join not. Could somebody point me why? Thank you. Hmm ... the reason why not seems to be that canonicalize_ec_expression() improperly adds a RelabelType node, causing the composite-type Vars to not be recognized as matching the eclass they should match. The attached patch fixes it and doesn't seem to break anything in the regression tests. This raises the question of why we don't treat type RECORD more like a true polymorphic type, but that's a can of worms I don't particularly want to open right now. For the moment, this is the only IsPolymorphicType call in the planner AFAICS, so there's some reason to hope that we don't have more bugs of the same ilk. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix misprocessing of equivalence classes involving record_eq().
- a11b3bd37f14 11.0 landed
- bc711befd6ce 9.3.24 landed
- ace3c7cc0518 9.6.10 landed
- aada0a7648e2 10.5 landed
- 6d7629094a52 9.5.14 landed
- 62e0020ad491 9.4.19 landed