Re: 8.0 Open Items
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-08-21T15:02:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Okay, I don't want to force an initdb just for this either. But if we >> do one for other reasons, it's toast. > I don't see why an initdb is required: if we want to remove it, we can > replace the function's implementation with elog(ERROR, "this function > has been removed"), or the like. The difference between doing that much > and actually removing the function's catalog entry is pretty negligible > from the user's POV. No, not at all. A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the user replacing the function, should he wish to do that. regards, tom lane