Re: 8.0 Open Items

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2004-08-21T15:02:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Okay, I don't want to force an initdb just for this either.  But if we
>> do one for other reasons, it's toast.

> I don't see why an initdb is required: if we want to remove it, we can 
> replace the function's implementation with elog(ERROR, "this function 
> has been removed"), or the like. The difference between doing that much 
> and actually removing the function's catalog entry is pretty negligible 
> from the user's POV.

No, not at all.  A nonfunctional catalog entry gets in the way of the
user replacing the function, should he wish to do that.

			regards, tom lane