Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2001-09-29T05:37:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> The following proposal should improve performance substantially when
> there is contention for a lock, but it creates no portability risks
> ...

I have committed changes to implement this proposal.  I'm not seeing
any significant performance difference on pgbench on my single-CPU
system ... but pgbench is I/O bound anyway on this hardware, so that's
not very surprising.  I'll be interested to see what other people
observe.  (Tatsuo, care to rerun that 1000-client test?)

			regards, tom lane