Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2001-09-29T05:37:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote: > The following proposal should improve performance substantially when > there is contention for a lock, but it creates no portability risks > ... I have committed changes to implement this proposal. I'm not seeing any significant performance difference on pgbench on my single-CPU system ... but pgbench is I/O bound anyway on this hardware, so that's not very surprising. I'll be interested to see what other people observe. (Tatsuo, care to rerun that 1000-client test?) regards, tom lane