Re: wip: functions median and percentile
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-08-19T17:25:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/median >> >> If you do a google search for "median" and poke around, you'll find >> many places where this is the only definition mentioned; the others >> seem to be rather infrequently used. Why not make the commone usage >> convenient? > The reason not to is the same reason that MEDIAN doesn't appear in the > SQL standard, namely that what's common in one field is wrong in > another. Hmm, do you have any *evidence* that that's why it's not in the standard? My own take on that is that it's reasonably probable that the SQL committee might standardize a function by that name someday. What we need to be worrying about is the prospect that if there are multiple definitions for the term, they might pick a different one than we did. A name like "arithmetic_median" seems much less likely to get blindsided by future standardization. regards, tom lane