Horton

Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-26T20:59:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
> wrote:
>> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode,
>> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode.

> Agreed, and applied as one patch.

Is there an argument for back-patching this?

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Back-patch checkpoint clarification docs and pg_basebackup updates