Re: 64-bit API for large object
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, anzai@sraoss.co.jp, nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Date: 2012-09-21T16:16:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: > Tom, could you give us a suggestion which manner is better approach; whether > the PQfn should have responsibility for endian translation of 64bit-integer, or > callers (lo_tell64 or lo_seek64)? Adding anything inside pqFunctionCall is useless, unless we were to add an int64 variant to PQArgBlock, which isn't a good idea because it will be an ABI break. The functions in fe-lobj.c have to set up the int64 value as if it were pass-by-reference, which means dealing with endianness concerns there. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove all the special-case code for INT64_IS_BUSTED, per decision that
- 901be0fad403 9.0.0 cited