Re: enable_resultcache confusion
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-07-08T18:00:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > "enable_nodememoization" would work for me That seems pretty unreadable. Maybe just "enable_memoization"? Really if we're going to do something here, we can't merely mess with the GUC name. David had expressed a willingness to rename everything about ResultCache some time ago, but nobody stepped up with a better name. Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"? regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Change the name of the Result Cache node to Memoize
- 47ca4836441d 14.0 landed
- 83f4fcc65503 15.0 landed