Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-11-27T23:17:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I've committed it now, and some buildfarm members are failing with lack > of shared memory, semaphores, or disk space. Don't know what to do with > that or why so many are failing like that. We could create a way to > omit the test if it becomes a problem. I believe the issue is that those BF members have kernel settings that only support running one postmaster at a time. The way you've got this set up, it launches a new private postmaster during a make installcheck; which is not only problematic from a resource consumption standpoint, but seems to me to violate the spirit of make installcheck, because what it's testing is not the installed postmaster but a local instance. Can you confine the test to only occur in "make check" mode, not "make installcheck", please? regards, tom lane