Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Date: 2026-03-12T19:31:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On 2026-Mar-11, Antonin Houska wrote:

> I'm not sure it can be fixed nicely in the REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) patch. I
> think the problem is that, in the current tree, VARSIZE_ANY() is used in such
> a way that the compiler cannot check the "array bounds". The restore_tuple()
> function is special in that it uses VARSIZE_ANY() to check a variable
> allocated from the stack, so the compiler can check the size.
> 
> I'm trying to fix that in a new diff 0002 - the point is that VARSIZE_ANY()
> should not need to dereference a pointer to varattrib_4b, since the size
> information is always located at the beginning of the structure. Maybe you
> have better idea.

I have no immediate ideas on this.

I offer the following rather trivial fixup diffs, which I think should
be mostly be for 0002.

Other trivial things I'd like to change, if you don't mind,
- the name pgoutput_repack sounds wrong to me.  I would rather say
  rpck_output, repack_output, repack_plugin, ... or something.  I don't
  understand where the suffix "output" comes from in the name
  "pgoutput", but it sounds like arbitrary nonsense to me.
- I would rename the routines in that file to also have the name
  "repack", probably as prefixes.

One thing we need and is rather not trivial, is to go through the table
AM interface rather than calling heapam.c routines directly.  I'm
working on this now and will present a patch later.

Another thing I noticed while going over the code was that we seem to
spill whole tuples even for things like the old tuple of an UPDATE and
for DELETE, but unless I misunderstand how this works, these shouldn't
be necessary: we just need the replica identity so that we can locate
the tuple to operate on.  Especially for tuples that contain large
toasted attributes, this is likely important.

It may make sense to use the TupleTableSlot interface rather than
HeapTuple for everything.  I'm not really sure about this though.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Most hackers will be perfectly comfortable conceptualizing users as entropy
 sources, so let's move on."                               (Nathaniel Smith)
      https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2007-01/msg00080.html

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY

  2. Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation

  3. Remove unnecessary signal handler change

  4. Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more

  5. Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"

  6. Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests

  7. REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN

  8. Add missing initialization

  9. Simplify declaration of memcpy target

  10. Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK

  11. doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)

  12. Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific

  13. Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast

  14. Fix valgrind failure

  15. Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK

  16. Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)

  17. Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting

  18. Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general

  19. Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack

  20. Introduce the REPACK command

  21. Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.

  22. Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h

  23. Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.

  24. Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance

  25. VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY