Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>,
wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-02-25T17:38:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Feb-25, Maxim Orlov wrote:
> Something of this kind?
Looks vaguely reasonable, without looking too much into the details.
I would prefer to have the callback do the errmsg() directly, so that
SlruReportIOError() can do something like
case SLRU_OPEN_FAILED:
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode_for_file_access(),
SlruCtl->errmsg_for_io_error(whatever),
errdetail("Could not open file \"%s\": %m.", path)));
break;
and the callback is something like
static int
xact_errmsg_for_io_error(const void *opaque_data)
{
TransactionId xid;
xid = opaque_data ? (*(TransactionId *) opaque_data) : InvalidTransactionId;
return errmsg("could not access status of transaction %u", xid);
}
We have various errdetail() routines of this kind.
Alternatively, maybe we could report in errmsg() the file operation that
failed, and the XID details etc as part of an error_context_stack
callback. The error reporting style we're using here is perhaps not
well adapted to the times.
> Should we start a new thread?
I think so, yeah.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"¿Qué importan los años? Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo" (Mafalda)
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix partial read handling in pg_upgrade's multixact conversion
- ac94ce8194e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Increase timeout in multixid_conversion upgrade test
- bd43940b02b2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve sanity checks on multixid members length
- ecb553ae8211 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check
- 170361d7b869 14.21 landed
- b0b52b7123ae 15.16 landed
- 7d42e2367c6b 16.12 landed
- cd1a887fe9bf 17.8 landed
- 3fbad030a24d 18.2 landed
- 366dcdaf5779 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Never store 0 as the nextMXact
- 87a350e1f284 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add runtime checks for bogus multixact offsets
- d4b7bde4183b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Widen MultiXactOffset to 64 bits
- bd8d9c9bdfa0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move pg_multixact SLRU page format definitions to a separate header
- bb3b1c4f6462 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert confusing macros in multixact.c to static inline functions
- 0099b9408e8c 17.0 landed
-
Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers
- 4ed8f0913bfd 17.0 cited
-
Cope with possible failure of the oldest MultiXact to exist.
- b6a3444fa635 9.4.4 cited