Re: Inval reliability, especially for inplace updates
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 08:52:42PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 22.01.26 18:42, Noah Misch wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 07:53:21AM -0800, Mark Dilger wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 9:47 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > > > Based on your experience, I probably should encourage packagers to do an > > > > early check of the packages they build, especially if they build tableam > > > > modules not found in PGXN. How do you see it? > > > > > > I don't know what you mean by "early". 18.2 hasn't stamped yet. 18.1 > > > doesn't have the change. So, I'd say that I'm building pretty early, and I > > > noticed the change will be coming in 18.2. > > > > I'll probably say: > > > > If you've tested your packaging builds against REL_17_STABLE and > > REL_18_STABLE since 2025-12-16 *or* you package only modules present in > > PGXN, you can stop reading. > > > > Mark Dilger reported non-PGXN tableam modules that needed changes to cope > > with back-patched signature changes in functions > > CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace() (commit 06b030e) and > > PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple() (commit 2e58802). Consider trying a rebuild > > against REL_17_STABLE and REL_18_STABLE now, so you learn about any similar > > need for changes in your modules. > > It has been requested to revert these, because they are an ABI and API > break, and they are unnecessary in the backbranches. Could we do this > please? The old API version was in 18.0 and 18.1 only. The new one is in 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21. How does your risk calculation weigh that? Let's talk about what you and others are seeing, in much more detail. > > > Oh, I don't mean to question the overall purpose of the patch. I was > > > questioning whether it needed to have breaking changes which are mere "code > > > cleanup". The change to CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace to remove the > > > unused third argument seemed inappropriate for backpatching, so I spoke up > > > before 18.2 is stamped. Doing this one piece of code cleanup in the back > > > branches will cause a lot of packaging pain for no real benefit. > > > > Is the source code for one of these modules published? I'm not picturing how > > a module could need a CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace() call, so your code may > > illuminate that for me. > > > > If you upload one of these modules to PGXN, my scans before future ABI breaks > > will find its calls and will block avoidable ABI breaks like the > > CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace() one. > > Since the heap AM calls this, it doesn't seem surprising that another table > AM would call it too. That is not the case. Inplace updates are not part of the table AM API. Since the system catalogs use heap, heap offers inplace updates. Where code performs heap inplace updates, heap function names appear verbatim.
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Update .abi-compliance-history for PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple().
- d88f4535d29f 15.16 landed
- a3e7bbd410d4 17.8 landed
- 2e58802f7332 14.21 landed
- 2655d2e47803 16.12 landed
-
Assert lack of hazardous buffer locks before possible catalog read.
- 0dfbd191a939 14.21 landed
- 86091202a8b1 15.16 landed
- 27e4fad9804c 16.12 landed
- bcb784e7d2f9 17.8 landed
- f4ece891fc2f 18.0 landed
-
For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations.
- 811422471940 14.21 landed
- 1d7b02711f70 16.12 landed
- 05d605b6c69f 15.16 landed
- 0f69beddea11 17.8 landed
- 4cf948cbeedf 12.21 landed
- 0ea9d40a6679 13.17 landed
- e3914bd136e4 14.14 landed
- 4eac5a1fa78e 15.9 landed
- ce8c571d014e 16.5 landed
- 95c5acb3fc26 17.1 landed
- 243e9b40f1b2 18.0 landed
-
Update .abi-compliance-history for CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace().
- 06b030e8973f 18.2 landed
-
Revisit cosmetics of "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."
- bae8ca82fd00 18.2 landed
- 64bf53dd61ea 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Correct comments of "Fix data loss at inplace update after heap_update()".
- 0839fbe400d7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move I/O before the index_update_stats() buffer lock region.
- d729f1ea5a46 12.21 landed
- 6b01cac0be6d 13.17 landed
- bb3054297661 14.14 landed
- 6d5b4031b927 15.9 landed
- 6c837c237bf8 16.5 landed
- 0bcb9d07940c 17.1 landed
- b412f402d1e0 18.0 landed
-
Revert "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."
- 4b0f7d6c162e 12.21 landed
- fe8091c9e39e 13.17 landed
- 4c7088729503 14.14 landed
- 27642d89081e 15.9 landed
- 6f9dd2282e37 16.5 landed
- c1099dd745b0 17.1 landed
-
Revert "WAL-log inplace update before revealing it to other sessions."
- 5e503e10d13e 12.21 landed
- be74b943c920 13.17 landed
- 9a1c73636d60 14.14 landed
- e50f9de98d63 15.9 landed
- d5be10758b36 16.5 landed
- bc6bad885725 17.1 landed
-
Fix inplace update buffer self-deadlock.
- 0bada39c83a1 18.0 landed
-
Remove duplicate words in comments
- fb7e27abfbd4 18.0 cited
-
At end of recovery, reset all sinval-managed caches.
- da9950456463 12.21 landed
- 67f30c79a1c1 13.17 landed
- dca68242a81b 14.14 landed
- 3baf804b7295 15.9 landed
- d36b4d8ec322 16.5 landed
- a4668c99f0f8 17.1 landed
-
Fix data loss at inplace update after heap_update().
- a07e03fd8fa7 18.0 cited
-
Remove comment about xl_heap_inplace "AT END OF STRUCT".
- c63ceb2f0006 13.16 landed
- 77d0bc8001e6 12.20 landed
- c7f10df36806 14.13 landed
- 2ca8ca4827af 15.8 landed
- e352ba7b7509 16.4 landed
- 4a7f91b3d314 17.0 landed
-
Reduce memory consumption for pending invalidation messages.
- 3aafc030a536 15.0 cited
-
Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.
- 464824323e57 14.0 cited
-
WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.
- c55040ccd017 14.0 cited
-
Introduce logical decoding.
- b89e151054a0 9.4.0 cited
-
Rename and document some invalidation routines to make it clearer that
- 81d08fcffeed 7.1.1 cited