Thread
Commits
-
Suppress new "may be used uninitialized" warning.
- a0769e74d65d 14.22 landed
- ec86152e0209 15.17 landed
- 50d361f6223f 17.9 landed
- 2280ab354516 16.13 landed
- d04b34d685a2 18.3 landed
- 8cef93d8a588 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix SUBSTRING() for toasted multibyte characters.
- a20eb248c51a 15.17 landed
- 14b1fd6176cb 14.22 landed
- bdfb372280bc 16.13 landed
- 5d5232bc38d3 17.9 landed
- 6e045e1a6e3f 18.3 landed
- 9f4fd119b2cb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
pg_mblen_range, pg_mblen_with_len: Valgrind after encoding ereport.
- 44fc85bbf990 14.22 landed
- 8e73530f1546 17.9 landed
- 5b305ebcc9b5 15.17 landed
- 45eb47230d93 16.13 landed
- 4174e41b9e9e 18.3 landed
- 4644f8b23bb8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
The Post Office <noreply@postgresql.org> — 2026-02-13T07:46:22Z
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 19406 Logged by: SATŌ Kentarō Email address: ranvis@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 15.16 Operating system: Linux 5.14.0-611.27.1.el9_7.x86_64 Description: After upgrading from PostgreSQL 15.15 to 15.16, substring(text) raises: >ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 on valid UTF-8 text stored in a TOAST-compressed column. The same SQL works on PostgreSQL 15.15. The data is valid UTF-8. The problem occurs only when operating on a TOAST-compressed value. Steps to Reproduce: $ psql psql (15.16) Type "help" for help. user=> \x Expanded display is on. user=> \set VERBOSITY verbose user=> create table toast_repro (data text); CREATE TABLE user=> insert into toast_repro select repeat('日向', 2000); -- e6 97 a5 e5 90 91 INSERT 0 1 user=> select pg_column_size(data), octet_length(data) from toast_repro; -[ RECORD 1 ]--+------ pg_column_size | 153 octet_length | 12000 user=> select substring(data from 1 for 2) from toast_repro; -[ RECORD 1 ]--- substring | 日向 user=> select substring(data from 1 for 1) from toast_repro; ERROR: 22021: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 LOCATION: report_invalid_encoding_int, mbutils.c:1796 user=> select substring('日向' from 1 for 1); -[ RECORD 1 ]- substring | 日 user=> select substring(data::varchar(100) from 1 for 1) from toast_repro; -[ RECORD 1 ]- substring | 日 user=> select substring(data from 1 for 1) from ( select data || '' as data from toast_repro) t; -[ RECORD 1 ]- substring | 日 Environment: version | PostgreSQL 15.16 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 11.5.0 20240719 (Red Hat 11.5.0-11), 64-bit server_encoding | UTF8 client_encoding | UTF8 lc_collate | ja_JP.UTF-8 lc_ctype | ja_JP.UTF-8 -
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-13T17:27:02Z
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 07:46:22AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > After upgrading from PostgreSQL 15.15 to 15.16, substring(text) raises: > >ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > on valid UTF-8 text stored in a TOAST-compressed column. > user=> select substring(data from 1 for 1) from toast_repro; > ERROR: 22021: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 Thanks for the report. That is a bug and a regression; I regret missing it during review. The substring operation works by taking a 4-byte slice from the toasted value (4 bytes being the max length of a UTF8 char in PostgreSQL), the finding the actual first character within those bytes. However, it incorrectly requires those four bytes to be a valid UTF8 string. I'll start on a fix.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2026-02-13T21:58:50Z
On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 6:27 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 07:46:22AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > After upgrading from PostgreSQL 15.15 to 15.16, substring(text) raises: > > >ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > > on valid UTF-8 text stored in a TOAST-compressed column. > > > user=> select substring(data from 1 for 1) from toast_repro; > > ERROR: 22021: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > > Thanks for the report. That is a bug and a regression; I regret missing it > during review. The substring operation works by taking a 4-byte slice from > the toasted value (4 bytes being the max length of a UTF8 char in PostgreSQL), > the finding the actual first character within those bytes. However, it > incorrectly requires those four bytes to be a valid UTF8 string. I'll start > on a fix. Ack. Also looking into this.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-13T22:48:04Z
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 09:27:02AM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 07:46:22AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > After upgrading from PostgreSQL 15.15 to 15.16, substring(text) raises: > > >ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > > on valid UTF-8 text stored in a TOAST-compressed column. > > > user=> select substring(data from 1 for 1) from toast_repro; > > ERROR: 22021: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > > Thanks for the report. That is a bug and a regression; I regret missing it > during review. The substring operation works by taking a 4-byte slice from > the toasted value (4 bytes being the max length of a UTF8 char in PostgreSQL), > the finding the actual first character within those bytes. However, it > incorrectly requires those four bytes to be a valid UTF8 string. I'll start > on a fix. Attached. I may add some more tests, e.g. a toasted invalid string where the detoasted length is less than the slice we request. This version is viable, however. I audited the other pg_mbstrlen_with_len(), and I think they're all okay with an error if the input has an incomplete char. Hence, those don't need changes beyond what we're already released. Most pass either parser input or an existing datum with its len. text_position_get_match_pos() is the most subtle caller, and I think it's fine. I audited other uses of slice detoast. The only other one is bytea substring, which is obviously indifferent to character encoding.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-14T00:21:13Z
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 02:48:04PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 09:27:02AM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 07:46:22AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > > After upgrading from PostgreSQL 15.15 to 15.16, substring(text) raises: > > > >ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > > > on valid UTF-8 text stored in a TOAST-compressed column. > > > > > user=> select substring(data from 1 for 1) from toast_repro; > > > ERROR: 22021: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe6 0x97 > > > > Thanks for the report. That is a bug and a regression; I regret missing it > > during review. The substring operation works by taking a 4-byte slice from > > the toasted value (4 bytes being the max length of a UTF8 char in PostgreSQL), > > the finding the actual first character within those bytes. However, it > > incorrectly requires those four bytes to be a valid UTF8 string. I'll start > > on a fix. > > Attached. I may add some more tests, e.g. a toasted invalid string where the > detoasted length is less than the slice we request. Tests already covered that in particular, but I added some other tests. I think this is now ready. Review welcome. I have a Valgrind test run ongoing.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-14T05:38:21Z
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 04:21:13PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > Review welcome. I have a Valgrind test run ongoing. Valgrind found the complaint below, but I think this an instrumentation problem. I've added a fix for that instrumentation. I also made minor edits to the log message of the main patch, hence v3. The release team is preparing to announce a 2026-02-26 out-of-cycle release in light of this regression. I plan to push these fixes at 2026-02-14T20:00+0000 to unblock that formal announcement. ==00:00:01:11.756 3464664== VALGRINDERROR-BEGIN ==00:00:01:11.756 3464664== Unaddressable byte(s) found during client check request ==00:00:01:11.769 3464664== at 0xC6076A: pg_mblen_with_len (mbutils.c:1115) ==00:00:01:11.769 3464664== by 0xC07CD3: pg_mbcharcliplen_chars (varlena.c:807) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC07AAD: text_substring (varlena.c:732) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC07797: text_substr (varlena.c:553) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x779688: ExecInterpExpr (execExprInterp.c:953) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x77BBD6: ExecInterpExprStillValid (execExprInterp.c:2299) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DBBC4: ExecEvalExprNoReturn (executor.h:423) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DBC73: ExecEvalExprNoReturnSwitchContext (executor.h:464) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DBCD3: ExecProject (executor.h:496) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DC134: ExecScanExtended (execScan.h:234) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DC474: ExecSeqScanWithProject (nodeSeqscan.c:162) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x794561: ExecProcNodeFirst (execProcnode.c:469) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== Address 0x19340a5e is 12,062 bytes inside a block of size 12,064 alloc'd ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== at 0x4C29F73: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC79F03: AllocSetAllocLarge (aset.c:756) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC7AA4C: AllocSetAlloc (aset.c:1033) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC8B37E: palloc (mcxt.c:1408) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x4B0182: detoast_attr_slice (detoast.c:324) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC5177F: pg_detoast_datum_slice (fmgr.c:1825) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC07A11: text_substring (varlena.c:716) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0xC07797: text_substr (varlena.c:553) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x779688: ExecInterpExpr (execExprInterp.c:953) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x77BBD6: ExecInterpExprStillValid (execExprInterp.c:2299) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DBBC4: ExecEvalExprNoReturn (executor.h:423) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== by 0x7DBC73: ExecEvalExprNoReturnSwitchContext (executor.h:464) ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== ==00:00:01:11.770 3464664== VALGRINDERROR-END { <insert_a_suppression_name_here> Memcheck:User fun:pg_mblen_with_len fun:pg_mbcharcliplen_chars fun:text_substring fun:text_substr fun:ExecInterpExpr fun:ExecInterpExprStillValid fun:ExecEvalExprNoReturn fun:ExecEvalExprNoReturnSwitchContext fun:ExecProject fun:ExecScanExtended fun:ExecSeqScanWithProject fun:ExecProcNodeFirst } 2026-02-13 21:03:38.905 PST client backend[3464664] pg_regress/encoding ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xe2 0x80 2026-02-13 21:03:38.905 PST client backend[3464664] pg_regress/encoding STATEMENT: SELECT SUBSTRING(c FROM 4001 FOR 1) FROM toast_3b_utf8; **00:00:01:11.771 3464664** Valgrind detected 1 error(s) during execution of "SELECT SUBSTRING(c FROM 4001 FOR 1) FROM toast_3b_utf8;" -
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2026-02-14T08:15:45Z
On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 6:38 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > [mblen-valgrind-after-report-v1.patch] LGTM. The new valgrind check should clearly be after the new non-local exit. Studying the other patch...
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2026-02-14T19:07:22Z
On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 9:15 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 6:38 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > [mblen-valgrind-after-report-v1.patch] > > LGTM. The new valgrind check should clearly be after the new non-local exit. > > Studying the other patch... /* - * Total slice size in bytes can't be any longer than the start - * position plus substring length times the encoding max length. - * If that overflows, we can just use -1. + * Total slice size in bytes can't be any longer than the + * inclusive end position times the encoding max length. If that + * overflows, we can just use -1. */ - if (pg_mul_s32_overflow(E, eml, &slice_size)) + if (pg_mul_s32_overflow(E - 1, eml, &slice_size)) slice_size = -1; Isn't it still conceptually "exclusive", but adjusted to be zero-indexed? /* Now we can get the actual length of the slice in MB characters */ - slice_strlen = pg_mbstrlen_with_len(VARDATA_ANY(slice), - slice_len); + slice_strlen = + (slice_size == -1 ? + pg_mbstrlen_with_len(VARDATA_ANY(slice), slice_len) : + pg_mbcharcliplen_chars(VARDATA_ANY(slice), slice_len, E - 1)); Comment presumably needs adjustment to say that we only count as far as we need to, and why. There is something a bit strange about all this, though. pg_mbstrlen_with_len(..., -1) returns 0, so if you ask for characters that really exist past 2^29 (~500 million), you must get an empty string, right? That's hard to reach, pre-existing and out of scope for the immediate problem report, except ... now we're contorting the code even further to keep it. The outline I had come up with before seeing your patch was: let's just delete it. The position search can check bounds incrementally, following our general approach. This avoids the reported problem by ditching the pre-flight scan through the slice (up to 4x more pg_mblen_XXX calls and memory access than we strictly need), and also the special cases for empty strings since they already fall out of the general behaviour (am I missing something?), not leaving much code behind. As far as I can see so far, the only user-visible side-effect requires corruption: substring() moves from the internal-NUL-is-terminator category to internal-NUL-is-character category, but that's an implementation detail. When I saw your patch yesterday, I initially abandoned the thought, thinking that your idea looked more conservative, but after sleeping on it and reflecting again on these oddities, I have merged my draft implementation with your tests, ancient detoasting fence post observation and commit message, just to see if you think this approach might be worth considering further. -
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-14T19:33:44Z
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 08:07:22AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 9:15 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 6:38 PM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > > [mblen-valgrind-after-report-v1.patch] > > > > LGTM. The new valgrind check should clearly be after the new non-local exit. > > > > Studying the other patch... Thank you. > /* > - * Total slice size in bytes can't be any > longer than the start > - * position plus substring length times the > encoding max length. > - * If that overflows, we can just use -1. > + * Total slice size in bytes can't be any > longer than the > + * inclusive end position times the encoding > max length. If that > + * overflows, we can just use -1. > */ > - if (pg_mul_s32_overflow(E, eml, &slice_size)) > + if (pg_mul_s32_overflow(E - 1, eml, &slice_size)) > slice_size = -1; > > Isn't it still conceptually "exclusive", but adjusted to be zero-indexed? Since it's discrete (being an integer), "up to E, exclusive" and "up to E - 1, inclusive" are the same thing. My comment may not be the optimal way to express that. > /* Now we can get the actual length of the slice in MB > characters */ > - slice_strlen = pg_mbstrlen_with_len(VARDATA_ANY(slice), > - > slice_len); > + slice_strlen = > + (slice_size == -1 ? > + pg_mbstrlen_with_len(VARDATA_ANY(slice), slice_len) : > + pg_mbcharcliplen_chars(VARDATA_ANY(slice), > slice_len, E - 1)); > > Comment presumably needs adjustment to say that we only count as far > as we need to, and why. Changed to: /* * Now we can get the actual length of the slice in MB characters, * stopping at the end of the substring. Continuing beyond the * substring end could find an incomplete character attributable * solely to DatumGetTextPSlice() chopping in the middle of a * character, and it would be superfluous work at best. */ > There is something a bit strange about all this, though. > pg_mbstrlen_with_len(..., -1) returns 0, so if you ask for characters > that really exist past 2^29 (~500 million), you must get an empty > string, right? That's hard to reach, pre-existing and out of scope > for the immediate problem report, except ... now we're contorting the > code even further to keep it. - slice_size is the amount we *requested* from the toaster. It can be -1, which retrieves the max available. - slice_len is the amount *returned* from the toaster. It's nonnegative. Does a behavior specific to strings >2^29 still exist? > The outline I had come up with before seeing your patch was: let's > just delete it. The position search can check bounds incrementally, > following our general approach. This avoids the reported problem by > ditching the pre-flight scan through the slice (up to 4x more > pg_mblen_XXX calls and memory access than we strictly need), and also > the special cases for empty strings since they already fall out of the > general behaviour (am I missing something?), not leaving much code > behind. Like you, I made a note that it's wasteful to make two mblen passes over the string. I'm only seeing a 50% reduction in mblen calls, not an 80% reduction, but I didn't look too closely. I guessed such a change would be less clearly correct, so I figured it would be less suitable for back branches. Hence, I didn't draft it. > As far as I can see so far, the only user-visible side-effect > requires corruption: substring() moves from the > internal-NUL-is-terminator category to internal-NUL-is-character > category, but that's an implementation detail. That does carry some risk, not necessarily too much to accept. > When I saw your patch yesterday, I initially abandoned the thought, > thinking that your idea looked more conservative, but after sleeping > on it and reflecting again on these oddities, I have merged my draft > implementation with your tests, ancient detoasting fence post > observation and commit message, just to see if you think this approach > might be worth considering further. My first impression, hurried due to the commit ETA in 30 minutes, is that this is less conservative and should hold for master-only.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2026-02-14T20:10:00Z
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 8:33 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > - slice_len is the amount *returned* from the toaster. It's nonnegative. Ah, right, that makes more sense. > > The outline I had come up with before seeing your patch was: let's > > just delete it. The position search can check bounds incrementally, > > following our general approach. This avoids the reported problem by > > ditching the pre-flight scan through the slice (up to 4x more > > pg_mblen_XXX calls and memory access than we strictly need), and also > > the special cases for empty strings since they already fall out of the > > general behaviour (am I missing something?), not leaving much code > > behind. > > Like you, I made a note that it's wasteful to make two mblen passes over the > string. I'm only seeing a 50% reduction in mblen calls, not an 80% reduction, > but I didn't look too closely. I guessed such a change would be less clearly > correct, so I figured it would be less suitable for back branches. Hence, I > didn't draft it. I was comparing to unpatched master, but yeah of course your patch already gets part of the way there. > My first impression, hurried due to the commit ETA in 30 minutes, is that this > is less conservative and should hold for master-only. Got it. Will add it to the pile of master-only fallout from this area.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> — 2026-02-14T20:19:04Z
Also, LGTM.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-14T22:46:21Z
On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 09:19:04AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > Also, LGTM. Pushed as commit 9f4fd11
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2026-02-16T18:21:45Z
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > Pushed as commit 9f4fd11 Various BF animals are complaining varlena.c: In function 'text_substring': varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] int32 E; /* end position, exclusive */ ^ and I've also seen that locally depending on which gcc version and -O level I'm using. Could we silence that? bollworm | 2026-02-16 09:32:03 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] camel | 2026-02-16 09:32:30 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] chimaera | 2026-02-16 11:40:29 | /home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:739:5: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] comma | 2026-02-16 14:55:48 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] conchuela | 2026-02-16 15:20:01 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] flea | 2026-02-16 09:31:52 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] krait | 2026-02-16 09:50:17 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] pipit | 2026-02-15 02:36:02 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] urocryon | 2026-02-15 01:45:07 | varlena.c:739:5: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] wireworm | 2026-02-16 15:20:49 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] ziege | 2026-02-15 01:18:25 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] regards, tom lane -
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-17T04:20:43Z
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 01:21:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > > Pushed as commit 9f4fd11 > > Various BF animals are complaining > > varlena.c: In function 'text_substring': > varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > int32 E; /* end position, exclusive */ > ^ > > and I've also seen that locally depending on which gcc version and -O > level I'm using. Could we silence that? > > > bollworm | 2026-02-16 09:32:03 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > camel | 2026-02-16 09:32:30 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > chimaera | 2026-02-16 11:40:29 | /home/debian/20-chimaera/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:739:5: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > comma | 2026-02-16 14:55:48 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > conchuela | 2026-02-16 15:20:01 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > flea | 2026-02-16 09:31:52 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > krait | 2026-02-16 09:50:17 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > pipit | 2026-02-15 02:36:02 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > urocryon | 2026-02-15 01:45:07 | varlena.c:739:5: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > wireworm | 2026-02-16 15:20:49 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > ziege | 2026-02-15 01:18:25 | varlena.c:590:9: warning: 'E' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] Thanks. I've pushed commit 8cef93d.
-
Re: BUG #19406: substring(text) fails on valid UTF-8 toasted value in PostgreSQL 15.16
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> — 2026-02-17T18:15:18Z
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 04:21:13PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 02:48:04PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote: > > Attached. I may add some more tests, e.g. a toasted invalid string where the > > detoasted length is less than the slice we request. > > Tests already covered that in particular, but I added some other tests. I cast a wider net for string function bugs specific to toasted strings and/or multibyte text. That yielded the attached. This did reproduce $SUBJECT, but it didn't find additional bugs. The method is crude, but I'm archiving it here so folks know the testing happened and in case someone pursues similar testing in the future.