Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-02-09T18:32:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello, On 2025-Apr-04, Rahila Syed wrote: > Please find attached the patch which removes the changes for > non-shared hash tables and keeps them for shared hash tables. > > I tested this by running make-check, make-check world and the reproducer > script shared by David. I also ran pgbench to test creation and > expansion of some of the shared hash tables. Was this forgotten, superseded, abandoned, or should it still be under consideration? https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5620/ Thanks, -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Commits
-
Allocate all parts of shmem hash table from a single contiguous area
- 9fe9ecd516b0 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Improve accounting for PredXactList, RWConflictPool and PGPROC
- 46df9487d973 18.0 landed
-
Improve accounting for memory used by shared hash tables
- f5930f9a98ea 18.0 landed