Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-12-30T01:42:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > But given that readline availability during the last five years was > apparently just fine I don't understand this discussion at all. Indeed. You could make a better case that we shouldn't be including in our distro the ODBC driver (LGPL) or the several contrib modules that are GPL'd than that psql's optional use of libreadline means we are in violation of GPL. I'm okay with including those things because of the GPL's "mere aggregation" exception --- none of the rest of the system uses any of those modules, so our inclusion of them in the distro looks like mere aggregation to me. But it's a much closer judgment call than the readline situation. regards, tom lane