Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-25T16:32:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v2-0001-Add-note-to-pg_dump-pg_restore-pages.patch (text/x-diff)
On 2024-Sep-26, Florents Tselai wrote: > Attached an idea. > The A/B example may be wordy / redundant, Yeah, it seems a little wordy to me, how about something like the attached? > but the -e note on the distinction between installing binaries / creating > an extension I think it's important. Hmm, ok, but I think that's a slightly unrelated topic because the shlib is not a database object. Maybe it would be more appropriate to add a mention of this directly in the docs for -e instead of trying to cram it in the note about other database objects. I'll wait for you to propose something for that part. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Commits
-
Docs: consolidate dependency notes in pg_dump and pg_restore
- 78bf28e3bf50 19 (unreleased) landed