Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>, Arseniy Mukhin <arseniy.mukhin.dev@gmail.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Rishu Bagga <rishu.postgres@gmail.com>,
Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>, Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>,
Alexandra Wang <alexandra.wang.oss@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2025-10-20T14:18:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Clear 'xid' in dummy async notify entries written to fill up pages
- 84f1bf4afa5e 14.21 landed
- 21a9014cf00a 15.16 landed
- 0e8eaa2181d4 16.12 landed
- d80d5f099502 17.8 landed
- 82fa6b78dba1 18.2 landed
- 0bdc777e8007 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix remaining race condition with CLOG truncation and LISTEN/NOTIFY
- c2e58c0711fe 14.21 landed
- 0c862646cf2a 15.16 landed
- 44e8c60be66c 16.12 landed
- c2682810ab7d 17.8 landed
- 7b069a1876e4 18.2 landed
- 797e9ea6e54b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix bug where we truncated CLOG that was still needed by LISTEN/NOTIFY
- eba917d360e7 14.21 landed
- 1a469d7b5b7d 15.16 landed
- 053e1868b7ee 16.12 landed
- d02c03ddc5e3 17.8 landed
- 321ec54625fd 18.2 landed
- 8eeb4a0f7c06 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Escalate ERRORs during async notify processing to FATAL
- 7cb05dd2d198 14.21 landed
- b1da37de21d4 15.16 landed
- c1a5bde003b8 16.12 landed
- b821c92920f0 17.8 landed
- aab4a84bb070 18.2 landed
- 1b4699090eaf 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Limit the size of TID lists during parallel GIN build
- c98dffcb7c70 19 (unreleased) cited
On 2025-Oct-20, Matheus Alcantara wrote: > This is similar to what was already proposed at [1]. This approach was > abandoned because a notification on the queue may block datfrozenxid > advance and clog truncation which can cause other issues for the users [2]. Well, I think that this is the right solution for backpatching, and that you were wrong to abandon it. You can continue to design a better mechanism for the master branch, but in old branches we cannot really do all those things you're proposing to do. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Cómo ponemos nuestros dedos en la arcilla del otro. Eso es la amistad; jugar al alfarero y ver qué formas se pueden sacar del otro" (C. Halloway en La Feria de las Tinieblas, R. Bradbury)