Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-12T16:09:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Mar-12, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:

> Does the test pass for you if you don't apply my patches?

Yes.  It also passes if I keep PG_TEST_EXTRA empty.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



Commits

  1. Hide expensive pg_upgrade test behind PG_TEST_EXTRA

  2. Set log_statement=none in t/002_pg_upgrade.pl

  3. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: Move pg_dump test code for better stability

  4. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: rename some variables for clarity

  5. Verify roundtrip dump/restore of regression database

  6. Refactor TAP test code for file comparisons into new routine in Utils.pm

  7. Virtual generated columns

  8. Put generated_stored test objects in a schema

  9. Introduce "builtin" collation provider.

  10. Revert "Improve compression and storage support with inheritance"