Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>
Date: 2025-01-31T13:40:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add support for NOT ENFORCED in foreign key constraints

  2. Expand test a bit

  3. refactor: Pass relation OID instead of Relation to createForeignKeyCheckTriggers()

  4. refactor: Split ATExecAlterConstraintInternal()

  5. refactor: Move some code that updates pg_constraint to a separate function

  6. Move RemoveInheritedConstraint() call slightly earlier

  7. refactor: Split tryAttachPartitionForeignKey()

  8. refactor: re-add ATExecAlterChildConstr()

  9. Add ATAlterConstraint struct for ALTER .. CONSTRAINT

  10. refactor: split ATExecAlterConstrRecurse()

  11. Add support for NOT ENFORCED in CHECK constraints

On 2025-Jan-31, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:

> But if the constraint is NOT VALID and later marked as NOT ENFORCED,
> what is expected behaviour while changing it to ENFORCED?

I think what you want is a different mode that would be ENFORCED NOT
VALID, which would be an extension of the standard, because the standard
does not support the concept of NOT VALID.  So while I think what you
want is nice, I'm not sure that this patch necessarily must implement
it.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/