Re: Retiring some encodings?
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
To: myon@debian.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, daniel@yesql.se, andrew@dunslane.net,
devops@ww-it.cn, ishii@postgresql.org, qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com,
hlinnaka@iki.fi, bruce@momjian.us, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org,
tony.zhu@ww-it.cn
Date: 2025-06-05T23:50:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>> Agreed that the so-said "state" level requirement would be a >> non-starter. > > Or maybe support for using these as server encodings could be > removed, keeping the client_encoding part intact? GB18030 is already client encoding only, and cannot be used as a server encoding. The only way to save GB18030 data into database is, converting GB18030 to UTF-8 (which can be done automatically). Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS K.K. English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/ Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp