Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-05-02T12:56:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix typo in comment
- a3994ec6acb2 18.0 landed
-
Make query jumbling also squash PARAM_EXTERN params
- c2da1a5d6325 18.0 landed
-
Fix squashing algorithm for query texts
- 0f65f3eec478 18.0 landed
-
pg_stat_statements: Fix parameter number gaps in normalized queries
- 3c03b8cd7979 13.22 landed
- 8a1459f62ad1 14.19 landed
- 130300a15407 15.14 landed
- 7e8b44f4e0e6 16.10 landed
- 290e8ab32ac5 17.6 landed
- 35a428f30b15 18.0 landed
On 2025-May-02, Michael Paquier wrote: > That depends. If we conclude that tracking this information through > the parser based on the start and end positions in a query string > for a set of values is more relevant, then we would be redesigning the > facility from the ground, so the old approach would not be really > relevant.. I disagree that a revert is warranted for this reason. If you want to change the implementation later, that's fine, as long as the user interface doesn't change. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem." (Tom Lane)