Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-01T06:22:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Mar-31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> Given where we are in the cycle, it seems to make sense to stick to using the
> schedule we already have rather than invent a new process for generating it,
> and work on that for 19?

No objections to that.  I'll see about getting this committed during my
morning today, so that I have plenty of time to watch the buildfarm.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
 Are you not unsure you want to delete Firefox?
       [Not unsure]     [Not not unsure]    [Cancel]
                   http://smylers.hates-software.com/2008/01/03/566e45b2.html



Commits

  1. Hide expensive pg_upgrade test behind PG_TEST_EXTRA

  2. Set log_statement=none in t/002_pg_upgrade.pl

  3. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: Move pg_dump test code for better stability

  4. 002_pg_upgrade.pl: rename some variables for clarity

  5. Verify roundtrip dump/restore of regression database

  6. Refactor TAP test code for file comparisons into new routine in Utils.pm

  7. Virtual generated columns

  8. Put generated_stored test objects in a schema

  9. Introduce "builtin" collation provider.

  10. Revert "Improve compression and storage support with inheritance"