Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy

Hi,

In <Z1-PjE6KPimF8w55@paquier.xyz>
  "Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy" on Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:25:16 +0900,
  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 04:46:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Note that using "test" as table name for the tests is not a good idea,
>> as this could very likely conflict with some concurrent activity.  I
>> would also add two RESET queries to remove the dependency to
>> client_encoding once the test has no need to rely on it.  No need to
>> send a new patch for all that, just noticing in passing.
> 
> I got some time to look again at this one.  Applied with the tweaks 
> for the table name and the two RESET queries.

Thanks!

I'll use better table name next time.


Thanks,
-- 
kou