Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya@amazon.com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-27T15:08:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:54:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> writes: >> What is the status of this? In the commitfest, this patch is marked as >> "Needs Review" with Nathan as reviewer - Nathan, were you going to take >> another look at this or was your mail from January 12th a full review? > > In my mind the ball is in Nathan's court. I feel it's about > committable, but he might not agree. I'll prioritize another round of review on this one. FWIW I don't remember having any major concerns on a previous version of the patch set I looked at. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.
- 81db073a2878 17.0 landed
- 0f1290521504 18.0 landed
-
Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.
- b3f0e0503f33 18.0 landed
- 2fa989e6a340 17.0 landed
-
Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.
- 959b38d770ba 17.0 landed
-
Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.
- a45c78e3284b 17.0 landed
-
Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
- 46a0cd4cefb4 17.0 cited
-
Fix typo and case in messages
- 7d7ef075d2b3 17.0 cited