Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Atkinson <andyatkinson@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, samay@tembo.io
Date: 2024-02-28T17:10:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, and SECURITY.md.
- dec9d4acdb7d 18.0 landed
-
Revise the style of a paragraph in README.md.
- 84d80663199b 17.0 landed
-
Convert README to Markdown.
- 363eb059966d 17.0 landed
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:56:57AM -0500, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > +1 on the general idea. Maybe make that COPYRIGHT link go to an absolute > URI, like all the other links, in case this file gets copied somewhere? > Perhaps point it to https://www.postgresql.org/about/licence/ I suspect there will be quite a bit of discussion about what to add to the README, which is great, but I think we should establish an order of operations here. We could either add suggested content to the README and then create an identical Markdown version, or we could create a Markdown version and add content to both afterwards. The former has my vote since it seems like it would require less churn. In any case, I think it would be useful to keep the Markdown effort separate from the content effort somehow (e.g., separate threads). -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com