Re: glibc qsort() vulnerability
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Mats Kindahl <mats@timescale.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-02-16T20:09:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Use new overflow-safe integer comparison functions.
- 3b42bdb47169 17.0 landed
-
Introduce overflow-safe integer comparison functions.
- 6b80394781c8 17.0 landed
-
Replace calls to pg_qsort() with the qsort() macro.
- 5497daf3aa2a 17.0 landed
-
Switch over to using our own qsort() all the time, as has been proposed
- 6edd2b4a91bd 8.2.0 cited
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:45:52PM +0100, Mats Kindahl wrote: > Looks good to me. Committed. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com