Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: tender wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-02-01T09:49:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hah:

postgres -c lc_messages=C -c shared_buffers=$((512*17))

2024-02-01 10:48:13.548 CET [1535379] FATAL:  invalid value for parameter "transaction_buffers": 17
2024-02-01 10:48:13.548 CET [1535379] DETAIL:  "transaction_buffers" must be a multiple of 16

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
<Schwern> It does it in a really, really complicated way
<crab> why does it need to be complicated?
<Schwern> Because it's MakeMaker.



Commits

  1. Fix zeroing of pg_serial page without SLRU bank lock

  2. Fix misspelled assertions

  3. GUC table: Add description to computed variables

  4. Improve performance of subsystems on top of SLRU

  5. Rename SLRU elements in view pg_stat_slru

  6. Use atomic access for SlruShared->latest_page_number

  7. Split use of SerialSLRULock, creating SerialControlLock

  8. Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers

  9. Add a macro templatized hashtable.