Horton
Menu

Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-01-25T16:08:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:06:41AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:39 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That seems like a reasonable starting point.  Even if it doesn't help
>> determine the root cause, it should at least help rule out concurrent
>> summary removal.
> 
> Here is a patch for that.

LGTM.  The only thing I might add is the cutoff_time in that LOG.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Avoid overflow in MaybeRemoveOldWalSummaries().

  2. Revert "Temporary patch to help debug pg_walsummary test failures."

  3. Revise pg_walsummary's 002_blocks test to avoid spurious failures.

  4. Temporary patch to help debug pg_walsummary test failures.

  5. More documentation updates for incremental backup.

  6. Fix typos.

  7. Fix typo.

  8. Try to fix pg_walsummary buildfarm failures.

  9. Repair various defects in dc212340058b4e7ecfc5a7a81ec50e7a207bf288.

  10. Add new pg_walsummary tool.

  11. Add new function pg_get_wal_summarizer_state().

  12. Document WAL summarization information functions.