Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-08-01T03:24:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState

  2. Doc: improve documentation for jsonpath behavior.

Hi,

On 2024-07-19 21:17:12 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2024-07-18 16:01:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru> writes:
> > > I fixed it. The code remains the same.
> > 
> > I see the cfbot is again complaining that this patch doesn't apply.
> > 
> > In hopes of pushing this over the finish line, I fixed up the (minor)
> > patch conflict and also addressed the cosmetic complaints I had
> > upthread [1].  I think the attached v4 is committable.  If Andres is
> > too busy, I can push it, but really it's his patch ...
> 
> Thanks for the rebase - I'll try to get it pushed in the next few days!

And finally done. No code changes. I did spend some more time evaluating the
resource usage benefits actually do exist (see mail upthread).

Thanks for the reviews, rebasing and the reminders!

Greetings,

Andres