Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c)
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-01T19:15:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Use safe string copy routine
- e930c872b65c 18.0 landed
On 2024-Jul-01, Ranier Vilela wrote: > > - char name[MAXPGPATH + 1]; > > + char name[MAXPGPATH];/* backup label name */ > > > > With the introduced use of strlcpy, why do we need to change this field? > > > The part about being the only reference in the entire code that uses > MAXPGPATH + 1. The bit I don't understand about this discussion is what will happen with users that currently have exactly 1024 chars in backup names today. With this change, we'll be truncating their names to 1023 chars instead. Why would they feel that such change is welcome? -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/