Re: BUG #18500: Detaching a partition with an index manually attached to the parent's index triggers Assert
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>, exclusion@gmail.com,
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-06-29T17:56:44Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix ALTER TABLE DETACH for inconsistent indexes
- d0054432d480 12.20 landed
- 83917791385a 18.0 landed
- 66aaa7a71841 14.13 landed
- 4ae09c59d6f5 15.8 landed
- 30ca4e1ab1ff 17.0 landed
- 05748256939b 13.16 landed
- 00a40e33c0a4 16.4 landed
On 2024-Jun-29, Laurenz Albe wrote: > My example that triggered this assert runs just fine on v16. Well, in a build without assertions enabled then yes it doesn't crash. But if you do have asserts enabled in 16, it does crash. > So while an error is clearly better than a crash, that would constitute > a regression. Is that really unavoidable? It would be very unfortunate > if the only way to detach a partition would be to drop some indexes first... The error would not occur on detach, but on attach, and it'd be intended to prevent an inconsistent situation. I'm proposing that on older branches we do what Tender proposed elsewhere, namely to cope with the detach without crashing (and without leaving inconsistent catalog state, such as bogus coninhcount values). -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Pero la cosa no es muy grave ..." (le petit Nicolas -- René Goscinny)