Re: Inval reliability, especially for inplace updates
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Update .abi-compliance-history for PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple().
- d88f4535d29f 15.16 landed
- a3e7bbd410d4 17.8 landed
- 2e58802f7332 14.21 landed
- 2655d2e47803 16.12 landed
-
Assert lack of hazardous buffer locks before possible catalog read.
- 0dfbd191a939 14.21 landed
- 86091202a8b1 15.16 landed
- 27e4fad9804c 16.12 landed
- bcb784e7d2f9 17.8 landed
- f4ece891fc2f 18.0 landed
-
For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations.
- 811422471940 14.21 landed
- 1d7b02711f70 16.12 landed
- 05d605b6c69f 15.16 landed
- 0f69beddea11 17.8 landed
- 4cf948cbeedf 12.21 landed
- 0ea9d40a6679 13.17 landed
- e3914bd136e4 14.14 landed
- 4eac5a1fa78e 15.9 landed
- ce8c571d014e 16.5 landed
- 95c5acb3fc26 17.1 landed
- 243e9b40f1b2 18.0 landed
-
Update .abi-compliance-history for CacheInvalidateHeapTupleInplace().
- 06b030e8973f 18.2 landed
-
Revisit cosmetics of "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."
- bae8ca82fd00 18.2 landed
- 64bf53dd61ea 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Correct comments of "Fix data loss at inplace update after heap_update()".
- 0839fbe400d7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move I/O before the index_update_stats() buffer lock region.
- d729f1ea5a46 12.21 landed
- 6b01cac0be6d 13.17 landed
- bb3054297661 14.14 landed
- 6d5b4031b927 15.9 landed
- 6c837c237bf8 16.5 landed
- 0bcb9d07940c 17.1 landed
- b412f402d1e0 18.0 landed
-
Revert "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."
- 4b0f7d6c162e 12.21 landed
- fe8091c9e39e 13.17 landed
- 4c7088729503 14.14 landed
- 27642d89081e 15.9 landed
- 6f9dd2282e37 16.5 landed
- c1099dd745b0 17.1 landed
-
Revert "WAL-log inplace update before revealing it to other sessions."
- 5e503e10d13e 12.21 landed
- be74b943c920 13.17 landed
- 9a1c73636d60 14.14 landed
- e50f9de98d63 15.9 landed
- d5be10758b36 16.5 landed
- bc6bad885725 17.1 landed
-
Fix inplace update buffer self-deadlock.
- 0bada39c83a1 18.0 landed
-
Remove duplicate words in comments
- fb7e27abfbd4 18.0 cited
-
At end of recovery, reset all sinval-managed caches.
- da9950456463 12.21 landed
- 67f30c79a1c1 13.17 landed
- dca68242a81b 14.14 landed
- 3baf804b7295 15.9 landed
- d36b4d8ec322 16.5 landed
- a4668c99f0f8 17.1 landed
-
Fix data loss at inplace update after heap_update().
- a07e03fd8fa7 18.0 cited
-
Remove comment about xl_heap_inplace "AT END OF STRUCT".
- c63ceb2f0006 13.16 landed
- 77d0bc8001e6 12.20 landed
- c7f10df36806 14.13 landed
- 2ca8ca4827af 15.8 landed
- e352ba7b7509 16.4 landed
- 4a7f91b3d314 17.0 landed
-
Reduce memory consumption for pending invalidation messages.
- 3aafc030a536 15.0 cited
-
Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.
- 464824323e57 14.0 cited
-
WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.
- c55040ccd017 14.0 cited
-
Introduce logical decoding.
- b89e151054a0 9.4.0 cited
-
Rename and document some invalidation routines to make it clearer that
- 81d08fcffeed 7.1.1 cited
Attachments
- inplace130-AtEOXact_RelationCache-comments-v1.patch (text/plain) patch v1
- inplace140-heapam_xlog-comment-v1.patch (text/plain) patch v1
- inplace150-inval-durability-atcommit-v1.patch (text/plain) patch v1
- inplace160-inval-durability-inplace-v1.patch (text/plain) patch v1
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 05:05:48PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com wrote: > > Separable, nontrivial things not fixed in the attached patch stack: > > > > - Inplace update uses transactional CacheInvalidateHeapTuple(). ROLLBACK of > > CREATE INDEX wrongly discards the inval, leading to the relhasindex=t loss > > still seen in inplace-inval.spec. CacheInvalidateRelmap() does this right. > > I plan to fix that like CacheInvalidateRelmap(): send the inval immediately, > inside the critical section. Send it in heap_xlog_inplace(), too. > a. Within logical decoding, cease processing invalidations for inplace I'm attaching the implementation. This applies atop the v3 patch stack from https://postgr.es/m/20240614003549.c2.nmisch@google.com, but the threads are mostly orthogonal and intended for independent review. Translating a tuple into inval messages uses more infrastructure than relmapper, which needs just a database ID. Hence, this ended up more like a miniature of inval.c's participation in the transaction commit sequence. I waffled on whether to back-patch inplace150-inval-durability-atcommit. The consequences of that bug are plenty bad, but reaching them requires an error between TransactionIdCommitTree() and AtEOXact_Inval(). I've not heard reports of that, and I don't have a recipe for making it happen on demand. For now, I'm leaning toward back-patch. The main risk would be me overlooking an LWLock deadlock scenario reachable from the new, earlier RelCacheInitLock timing. Alternatives for RelCacheInitLock: - RelCacheInitLock before PreCommit_Notify(), because notify concurrency matters more than init file concurrency. I chose this. - RelCacheInitLock after PreCommit_Notify(), because PreCommit_Notify() uses a heavyweight lock, giving it less risk of undetected deadlock. - Replace RelCacheInitLock with a heavyweight lock, and keep it before PreCommit_Notify(). - Fold PreCommit_Inval() back into AtCommit_Inval(), accepting that EIO in unlink_initfile() will PANIC. Opinions on that? The patch changes xl_heap_inplace of XLOG_HEAP_INPLACE. For back branches, we could choose between: - Same change, no WAL version bump. Standby must update before primary. This is best long-term, but the transition is more disruptive. I'm leaning toward this one, but the second option isn't bad: - heap_xlog_inplace() could set the shared-inval-queue overflow signal on every backend. This is more wasteful, but inplace updates might be rare enough (~once per VACUUM) to make it tolerable. - Use LogStandbyInvalidations() just after XLOG_HEAP_INPLACE. This isn't correct if one ends recovery between the two records, but you'd need to be unlucky to notice. Noticing would need a procedure like the following. A hot standby backend populates a relcache entry, then does DDL on the rel after recovery ends. Future cleanup work could eliminate LogStandbyInvalidations() and the case of !markXidCommitted && nmsgs != 0. Currently, the src/test/regress suite still reaches that case: - AlterDomainDropConstraint() queues an inval even if !found; it can stop that. - ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS nontransactionally rebuilds an index, which sends a relcache inval. The point of that inval is, I think, to force access methods like btree and hash to reload the metapage copy that they store in rd_amcache. Since no assigned XID implies no changes to the temp index, the no-XID case could simply skip the index rebuild. (temp.sql reaches this with a read-only transaction that selects from an ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS table. Realistic usage will tend not to do that.) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS has another preexisting problem for indexes, mentioned in a code comment. Thanks, nm